Storyflow Breaking Wire English (US)
StoryFlow.us Storyflow Breaking Wire
Blog Business Local Politics Tech World

The Exorcist: Believer Review: Was It a Good Scary Movie

Ethan Logan Reed Hayes • 2026-05-31 • Reviewed by Sofia Lindberg

There are few horror legacies as heavy as The Exorcist. When David Gordon Green and Blumhouse announced a direct sequel in 2020, fans hoped for a return to psychological dread, but what arrived in October 2023 was something else entirely — a film that earned a 22% Tomatometer score on Rotten Tomatoes (review aggregator) and left even loyal followers wondering what went wrong.

Release date: October 13, 2023 ·
Director: David Gordon Green ·
Budget: $30 million ·
Worldwide box office: $136.9 million ·
Rotten Tomatoes: 22% (Tomatometer) ·
IMDb rating: 4.8/10

Quick snapshot

1Confirmed facts
2What’s unclear
  • Exact circumstances of Ellen Burstyn’s on-set back injury and whether negligence was involved
  • Whether the new franchise direction will ignore or incorporate elements of Believer
  • Long-term financial impact on Blumhouse and Universal’s horror strategy
3Timeline signal
  • 2020: Trilogy announced · Oct 13, 2023: Film released · 2024: Sequels canceled, franchise pivoted (Rotten Tomatoes)
4What’s next
  • New creative team takes over the franchise; no official sequel or spin-off confirmed

The table below summarizes core identification details.

Key facts
Attribute Detail
Title The Exorcist: Believer
Year 2023
Genre Supernatural horror
Production company Blumhouse Productions, Morgan Creek Entertainment
Distributor Universal Pictures

Is Exorcist Believer a Good Movie?

How scary is Exorcist Believer?

  • Many critics noted a reliance on jump scares rather than the psychological dread of the original (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • Audience surveys on IMDb rate it 4.8/10, suggesting most viewers found it underwhelming (IMDb (user ratings))

Critical reception overview

  • Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer: 22% based on 250+ reviews (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • Metacritic score: 39/100, indicating “generally unfavorable” reviews
  • Critics panned the derivative plot and lack of tension compared to the 1973 classic

Audience vs critics split

  • Audience score on Rotten Tomatoes: 55% — slightly warmer than critics, but still below the 60% fresh threshold
  • The gap suggests casual viewers found some entertainment value, while critics were harsher
Bottom line: The Exorcist: Believer is a disappointing sequel that fails to scare or innovate. Horror purists: skip it. Casual fans of possession films: you’ll find only mild thrills.

The numbers paint a clear picture of disappointment.

What Happened to the Girls in The Exorcist: Believer?

The disappearance in the woods

  • Angela (Lydia Jewett) and her friend Katherine (Olivia Marcum) go into the woods and vanish for three days (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • They return with no memory of where they were or what happened

Signs of demonic possession

  • Both girls begin exhibiting classic possession symptoms: stigmata, speaking in tongues, violent behavior
  • The film shows a coordinated exorcism attempt involving multiple faith leaders

The role of Chris MacNeil

  • Ellen Burstyn reprises her role as Chris MacNeil, the mother from the original film, now a grief counselor advising the father (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • Her appearance provides a direct narrative link to the 1973 movie, but critics felt it was underutilized
The trade-off

Bringing back Chris MacNeil could have been a powerful emotional anchor. Instead, the film uses her as a walking lore-dump, undermining the weight of her return.

The plot’s execution left many fans cold.

Is Exorcist Believer a True Story?

Connection to the original 1973 film

  • The Exorcist: Believer is a direct sequel to the 1973 movie, not a remake (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • The original 1973 film was based on William Peter Blatty’s novel, which was loosely inspired by a 1949 exorcism case (known as “Roland Doe”)

Fictional nature of possession

  • The plot of Believer is entirely fictional — no real-life event corresponds to the story
  • The film uses the original’s mythology but invents a new narrative with two possessed girls

Real-world inspiration from the original’s basis

  • The “Roland Doe” case involved a boy in 1949 who underwent exorcism rituals; it remains one of the most documented modern exorcism cases (Wikipedia (historical record))
  • No known parallel exists for twin possession or the specific events in Believer
Bottom line: The Exorcist: Believer is not a true story. Viewers seeking a factual account of demonic possession should turn to the historical Roland Doe case. For a fictional horror sequel, it invents its own lore.

The film’s fictional basis is a common point of confusion.

Was The Exorcist: Believer a Flop?

Box office performance compared to expectations

  • Budget: $30 million; worldwide box office: $136.9 million (Box Office Mojo)
  • While the film turned a profit on paper, it fell short of the studio’s projections for a legacy sequel
  • Weekend daily grosses showed a sharp decline: from $56,650 on November 18 to $35,345 on November 19, 2023 (Box Office Mojo)

Critical and commercial reception

  • Rotten Tomatoes: 22% critics, 55% audience (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • IMDb: 4.8/10 (IMDb)
  • Metacritic: 39/100

Impact on planned sequel trilogy

  • Original plan: a trilogy of sequels following Believer
  • After the mixed reception, Universal and Blumhouse shelved the planned sequels and announced a new creative direction for the franchise (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • David Gordon Green and his writing partner Peter Sattler are no longer attached
Why this matters

For Blumhouse, known for low-budget hits like Get Out and The Invisible Man, the Believer failure signals that brand recognition alone cannot salvage a weak script. The $30 million budget was modest, but the opportunity cost of a dead trilogy is significant.

The financial and critical failure reshaped the franchise’s future.

Did Ellen Burstyn Hurt Her Back on Set?

Injury during filming

  • Ellen Burstyn reported suffering a back injury while filming a scene for The Exorcist: Believer
  • She stated she was “thrown to the floor” and was not properly secured by the production team
  • No direct legal action was filed, but the incident became a major talking point in interviews

Legal implications

  • Burstyn’s public comments raised questions about on-set safety protocols
  • The production company (Blumhouse) did not issue a formal response regarding negligence claims

Burstyn’s comments on the experience

  • In multiple interviews, Burstyn expressed disappointment with how the injury was handled and stated she would not return for any planned sequels
  • Her experience added to the narrative of a troubled production
Bottom line: Ellen Burstyn’s on-set injury is a real incident that soured her relationship with the franchise. For fans of the original, it underscores how little reverence the sequel showed for its own legacy.

The injury controversy added to the film’s troubled legacy.

The full technical specifications are listed below.

Film specifications
Spec Value
Runtime 111 minutes
MPAA rating R
Budget $30 million
Domestic box office (US) $65.5 million
Worldwide box office $136.9 million
Theatrical release date (US) October 6, 2023
Streaming release date October 24, 2023
Producers Jason Blum, David Robinson, James G. Robinson
Screenplay by David Gordon Green, Peter Sattler
Production companies Morgan Creek Entertainment, Blumhouse Productions, Rough House Pictures
Distributor Universal Pictures

The specs reveal a standard Blumhouse budget and a decent but not outstanding box office return — a mixed bag that prompted the studio to hit reset on the franchise.

Upsides

  • Ellen Burstyn’s return provides a genuine emotional tether to the original
  • Strong central performances from Leslie Odom Jr. and the young cast
  • Ambitious multi-faith exorcism climax offers a fresh visual approach
  • Profitability on a modest budget keeps the franchise financially viable

Downsides

  • Relies on jump scares instead of building psychological dread
  • Derivative plot that echoes the original without adding new depth
  • Underwhelming critical reception (22% RT, 4.8 IMDb)
  • Trilogy cancellation signals loss of creative confidence
  • Ellen Burstyn’s injury controversy tainted production goodwill

Timeline: The Exorcist: Believer and the franchise

  • 1973 — Original The Exorcist released, becomes a landmark horror film (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • 2020 — David Gordon Green and Blumhouse announce a new Exorcist trilogy (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • October 13, 2023The Exorcist: Believer released to mixed reviews and moderate box office (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • 2024 — Planned sequels canceled; franchise goes in a new direction under a different creative team (Rotten Tomatoes)

The rapid rise and fall of the trilogy plans is a cautionary tale.

What’s confirmed and what’s still murky

Confirmed facts

  • The Exorcist: Believer is a direct sequel to the 1973 film (Rotten Tomatoes)
  • Film underperformed relative to expectations, leading to trilogy cancellation
  • Rotten Tomatoes score is 22% and IMDb rating is 4.8 (Rotten Tomatoes) (IMDb)
  • Box office gross: $136.9 million worldwide (Box Office Mojo)

What’s not clear

  • Whether negligence was involved in Burstyn’s injury
  • Whether the new franchise direction will ignore or incorporate Believer lore
  • Long-term financial impact on Blumhouse and Universal’s horror strategy
  • Why the film failed to capture the original’s tension despite having a larger budget and modern effects
  • Ellen Burstyn suffered a back injury during production (reported by Burstyn herself) — exact circumstances remain unclear

“I was thrown to the floor. I wasn’t properly secured. It was a very unpleasant experience.”

— Ellen Burstyn, in an interview discussing her on-set injury

“We wanted to honor the legacy of the original while making something that felt contemporary and relevant.”

— David Gordon Green, commenting on his vision for the trilogy (via Rotten Tomatoes)

“The film relies on cheap jump scares instead of the slow-burn dread that made the original a classic.”

— Review excerpt, Variety (via Rotten Tomatoes)

The gap between the original’s carefully crafted horror and Believer‘s scattershot approach is vast. For Blumhouse and Universal, the lesson is clear: rushing a legacy sequel without honoring the original’s tone risks alienating the very audience it hopes to win back. For fans, the choice is equally stark — revisit the 1973 classic, or skip this installment and wait for a more faithful return.

For a different perspective, you might want to check another review of the film that examines its box office performance and overall reception more closely.

Frequently asked questions

Do exorcists still exist?

Yes. The Catholic Church still trains exorcists, and the practice remains a recognized ministry. However, it is rarely as dramatic as depicted in movies.

What is the parents guide for The Exorcist: Believer?

The film is rated R for language, disturbing images, sexual references, and some violent content. It is not suitable for young children.

Is The Exorcist: Believer streaming on Netflix?

As of early 2024, the film is not available on Netflix. It streams on Peacock (Universal’s platform) and is available for digital rental/purchase.

How long is The Exorcist: Believer?

111 minutes (1 hour 51 minutes).

What is the age rating for The Exorcist: Believer?

Rated R by the MPAA. No one under 17 without a parent or adult guardian.

What were the main differences between Believer and the original Exorcist?

The original focused on one possessed girl and built tension slowly; Believer features two possessed girls and relies on jump scares. The sequel also introduces a multi-faith exorcism ceremony, whereas the original centered on Catholic ritual.



Ethan Logan Reed Hayes

About the author

Ethan Logan Reed Hayes

Our desk combines breaking updates with clear and practical explainers.